Tuesday, April 21, 2009
Freedom Files Website
Right Click and select 'Save Target' to Download
HOW I CLOBBERED EVERY BUREAUCRATIC CASH-CONFISCATORY AGENCY KNOWN TO MAN
... a Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and
Remembering Who You Are
Mary Elizabeth: Croft
The Extortion System of The Ruling Elite
The Extortion System of the Ruling Elite - html version
( Note: you can still reference the original analysis page here. )
The following Analysis is primarily focused on the outside of the Pentagon. When one takes this evidence alone it is very conclusive that a AA 757 did not hit the Pentagon. However there are some unconfirmed photographic evidence of wreckage of a 757 within the Pentagon itself, which does support the Official Story in so far that a AA 757 did hit the Pentagon.A CNN Reporter at the scene states that there is no evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon. Watch this video clip:
CNN: 'No evidence of a plane crashing anywhere near the Pentagon'
I have found a good picture of the landing Gear on the Global Hawk and it's wheel rims do not match the wheel rims of a 757. So much for the Global Hawk Theories. The wheel rim found in the wreckage more closely resembles one found on a 757, however there are some differences there too. The rim looks smaller, the color is different and there seems to be a missing indent that circles the rim near the edge of the rim. It may appear that it was torn off the rim though, thus further analysis on this must be done.
The simple fact that there are no wing marks on the Pentagon wall, the hole is too small for a 757 to fit through. Further the street light that was apparently knocked down by the Boeing 757 shows glass from the street lamp near by, thus a plane hitting it at 400 MPH whould have thrown the glass a very long distance as it would have shattered on impact. It is likely that the street light was blown just prior to the jet that shot a missile at the Pentagon flew in to make room for it in it's flight path. See the picture of the taxi on the road with the street lamp beside it bellow. However as always it is only speculation as again they will not release the videos of what happened and you should ask what is it that they are trying to hide? They certainly had no problems releasing footage of the WTC and Flight 93, although Flight 93 was shot down once the passengers got control of the plane, they found the engine 5 miles away from the crash site.
For those who are skeptical of the vast amount of evidence which shows that a 757 could not have hit the Pentagon, here is an interesting bit of info for you to look at before diving into this extensive Analysis. Here is a copy of the Public Works Digest for October/November of 2001, which has statements in it as follows:page 6 where is the plane did anyone see it after it hit
page 7 doubtful of plane
page 8 all kinds of rumors truck bomb, helo bomb
page 9 bomb
FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impact
High-Ranking Army Officer - Missile Hit Pentagon
Petition - Tell The President To Release The 9/11 Pentagon Footage Of The Plane
What hit the Pentagon? A Boeing 757 loaded with passengers and fuel right? Well perhaps that has now become a serious question of debate. Over the past year I have been collect information on the crash and making an attempt to piece together what actually happened. Believe me it hasn't been easy and I still don't have all the answers. However as time goes on I learn more and get more view points to work with. Much of this speculation can be put to rest perhaps by having the FBI release a video the took from a Gas Station surveillance cameras shortly after the Pentagon was hit.
Who was on Flight 77? According to the Flight Information there were No Arabs on it. That makes me wonder if Flight 77 actually existed at all? Please don't get me wrong here I mean absolutely no disrespect in bringing forward the names of the people on Flight 77. Here is the list of names that are unverified by myself. It is horrible to have to analyze the Pentagon crash when real people were killed and families must still miss them terribly but, there are a number of problems with the Official Story that do need to be brought to light. What pisses me off is there are no Government agencies anywhere in the world analyzing this information and bringing it forward to the public, nothing other than a few Members of Parliament or Government Whistle Blowers. It is disgusting!
Item one up for discussion are the obvious two pictures I have collect on the CAD models placed in front of the Pentagon as the models crash into the Pentagon.
We are talking about a 269,434 lb plane, hitting the pentagon wall at around 400 MPH.
Now that we have seen the plane lets look at the Pentagon 4 days before September 11th.
What does this mean, well in Illuminati Symbology terms it is like a calling card I would say. Further if what we are seeing here is real then it gives credibility to the fact that the so called Terrorists were Patsies and this Ariel marking pattern may have been used to mark the impact point from the air where the pilot or object was suppose to hit the Pentagon.
Those who do not know who and what the Illuminati are, I suggest that you download and watch David Icke's Lecture on the Illuminati.
For two years I have been searching for a picture that would confirm the Satalite image and today a nice fellow found one and sent it too me. I find it amazing how blurred out the pics were. You can see the path marker and the outline of the eye as well, if you look closely enough! See part of the problem was that they covered up the grass with dirt and stones so fast that there were so few pictures available of the Grass as shown bellow.
Here is one image of the lawn that shows some of the Ariel Path Marker.
The Approximate Flight Path:
Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11
I was a bit confused at first as to if the Punchout Hole was created by the object striking the Pentagon Wall or if the Rescue workers did it, in order to gain access to the damaged areas. It would seem that based on the debris and the heat/smoke damage done to the top part of the hole and the debris that it was indeed caused by the object hitting the wall. It is speculated that this was where one of the engines came through or a missile impact.
It seems like the hole is in line with the impact path and does support the fact that a missile may have hit the pentagon. However it would seem that this hole was actually done by a Backhole for the workers to gain access.http://www.patriotresource.com/wtc/federal/0915/DoD.html
Mystery Aircraft in video taped in Pentagon Area when all flights were suppose to be down
Now what we see here is debris being pushed away from the hole. The steel columns near the impact are not pushed in but pushed sideways, like what would happen if a bomb went off, not like what would happen if a plane hit it. You can see a hole big enough for the fuselage possibly on the left, However there hole the claimed hole it made is to the right, which clearly could not possibly fit the fuselage of a 757 through it. It is also important to note that there is no wing damage to the building at all. By all rights if the wings could take out Light Poles, beams shouldn't even be there, wouldn't you think? The smoke covers up the arching hole, so it is difficult to get a clear understanding of what the damage really is. It also makes me wonder if perhaps we are seeing 2 impact points, not one. The damage to right side of the picture looks like it could have been a explosion that occurred in the building, while to the left, that arching aspect looks like it may have been an impact point.
Take a look at this hole and notice that the I beams are gone, they are not there at all! Thus why then are the beems still there in the Pentagon Crash. The WTC was designed to take a hit from a 747 and yet the beams are gone! Thus it does support that a small aircraft or missile hit the Pentagon and not a AA 757.
Now take a look at this picture. Notice that the smoke to the right of the impact point is black versus the white smoke coming from the building. What is going on here? Now Crude oil when it burns gives off black smoke, so the question is what is burning over there to the right behind the fence that is giving off black smoke? Now I agree it just could be the lighting in the photo that makes it appear dark, but it is a separate fire. Because the Pentagon has a Helicopter Pad and is by a reason a heliport, it may also store fuel on that side of the pentagon. This may explain the contents being fuel stored behind the fenced area we see in this picture. If it was fuel, then the fireball we see from the security camera, might be actually the fuel exploding and not the plane. It is only a hypothesis at the moment, but just keep it in mind. As more information becomes available I or we can look into this further.
There also appears to be a line in the grass much like what we see in the Satellite photo up top, although it is still unclear that it is the same line, it is a line in the grass pointing at the impact site. Clearly the line in the grass points towards the crash site. It is one of the few pics that does show the line or rather All Seeing Eye.
This picture and the previous one show that something took out the fenced in area to some degree. The fenced area was probably damaged from the impact blast. The height of the stubs on the fence are lower than the spools of wire sitting on the lawn, so that doesn't support a wing impact at all. The spools shouldn't even be in this condition after a 757 hit the building. They would have been crushed. The hole in the pentagon is far to small for the fuselage of the plane to fit in so it is looking more and more like a missile hit than anything else.
I do find it interesting that with a 260,000 lb plane you don't see much of any aircraft debris, if at all. Another obvious question is, What are spools of heavy gauge wire doing on the west lawn of the Pentagon?
The Picture bellow even shows it more clearly that although some of the space has been blown out, the pylons remaining with stood the force of a 269,434 lb plane doing about 400 MPH, ploughing into it?
Lets take a walk through to the crash site. Click on the link bellow to load a video taken on September 11th at the Pentagon. Watch for debris. You will see a piece of debris in the video that looks like a piece of landing gear. However the gear itself is not burnt, twisted or damaged in any way. Odd don't you think? The wheel is still inflated and not burnt off. I was shown a picture that alleged wheel in the picture was indeed a welders cart, which holds tanks. It could very well be, but the placement of it and to the casual observer it would register I believe as landing gear wreckage. Intentional or not, that's how I looked at it when I first saw it.
A Smoking Gun:
Click Picture for a Larger Picture
This is pictuer makes it obvious that the front and rear landing rims do of the Global Hawk do not match the wheel found in the Pentagon Wreckage.
Here we have what I am told is a picture of the rear landing gear of an American Airlines Boeing 757 up close. The problem is that although this is being toughted as being the same wheel as that of one found in the wreckage, there are some problems with it. The color is wrong to begin with, should be silvery in color and there is a missing indent that circles the rim. The angle of the inner structure is also differnt and comparing the wheel found in the wreckage to the front Gear of the Global Hawk it is a possible match with the Global Hawk, just need a better picture to confirm this.
To further this Global Hawk angle lets look at this engine part found in the wreckage
Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? - A 727 JT8D
It would seem that Jon Carlson feels that the landing gear photographed in the wreckage matches that of a Boeing 737. I am not sure if I have seen the pictures on a FEMA site or not, but the debris seems consistent with the Pentagon site. Take a look at the article and pictures.For further analysis of the engine parts go here
Pentagon Survivor Claims it was a 737 that hit the Pentagon
The thing I find so interesting about this picture is the glass on the pavement in proximity of the pole. A jet going roughly 400 MPH hitting the pole and the glass from the light lands near where the pole is. The glass should have shattered the instant the plane hit the pole and land in a totally different area. This pole looks like it was just tossed into this position. What is also interesting in all the pole pictures is that the poles seem to have snapped off at the base. The mid section of the pole isn't even bent or dented, which is where the maximum stress would be as the pole bends.
Safe Breakaway Light Poles:
Note there is no pic I can find of Pole 2. So for now we will analyze these pictures.
Considering the sheer strength of the poles I find it hard to imagine that wing wasn't severely damaged. The other thing about the light poles is that the plane was traveling very fast, about 400 MPH. If the plane hit the poles going that speed the poles wouldn't be close the road or on the road, rather they would be thrown a long way from the road, providing they didn't sheer the wings off. Hence we are talking about 5 poles here not one!
To further this example, think about all the radio towers perched up on all the buildings and around town. They all have aircraft warning lights on them right? What would happen to a plane if it hit just one of those towers, not least to say Five!
Bottom line is we have all seen accident pictures of cars crashing into light poles and know the kind of damage that can be done to car. So what about an airplane wing? The Plane would be a fireball before it even hit the pentagon and probably would have crashed into the lawn first as it would be pulled down by hitting the poles and rupturing fuel tanks in the wings. The Light Poles are planted and a detraction. With a little Photoshop Pro work anything can be manufactured wouldn't you say? However if the poles were down I suspect they wouldn't have been brought down by Flight 77.
A Boeing 757 can carry up to 11,489 Gallons of Fuel. Tanks are located in the under-belly and sometimes in the wings. The fire was limited to outer section and roof areas. The section of the Pentagon hit was only 5 days from completion of some very heavy fortified renovations. Heavy steel beams etc put into the building. Interesting that they were only 5 days away from the renovations when they got hit don't you think? It was interesting how all the fuel spewed out the World Trade Center but nothing spewed out of the Pentagon into the other sections. Odd thing, however if you check on the WTC page you will see that a 767 was fitted with some kind of fuel bomb to increase the drama I guess. The Fuel still burns at around 875 degrees and steel melts at 2800 degrees.
One final point about the poles. The so called terrorists had only about 10 hours simulator flight time a little bit of actual Cessna training and probably some played around with a flight simulator on a home computer from what I have heard on documentaries. The It is odd don't you think that the plan would swing around and hit the side of the Pentagon where the aerial marker was in the lawn. Also to steer a plane perfectly through 5 lamp poles just skimming the ground is pretty tough for a real pilot let alone armatures under a great deal of stress and chaos. There is no way in my mind that they could have flown the course they did and the course they did fly makes no logical sense. When you are determined to hit something like the pentagon, you don't aim for a particular wall you come in from above and you dive at it. To hit the pentagon the way they did is way beyond their skills and abilities. It is so much easier to just dive in at the Pentagon then to be slamming into Light Poles etc. With the total lack of airplane wreckage, bodies and luggage etc. it makes no sense that a 757 hit the Pentagon at all. There are a number of other supporting websites and theories that support this argument. Just a comment for now. I'll keep working on it.
Just as a side note, put yourself in the terrorists shoes for a moment. If you had a choice of hitting the Pentagon or the west wing of the White House, which target would you pick? I'll leave it at that.It is still difficult to explain away why the Pentagon wall did not have any marks on it in terms of wing impact. The limestone would surely have been damaged by the wings. The block used to smash the F4 was designed to resist the impact of the F4, but I don't think the Pentagon wall was designed to take a hit by a Boeing 757, even with the upgrades that they were just completing, proof of that is the hole and damage created by the aircraft that hit the Pentagon, the block that stopped the F4 has no hole in it. I'll Leave this one for you to decide.
Video 1 of the F4 hitting the wall
Video 2 of the F4 hitting the wall Just a side note concerning Sandia the company that did these F4 tests. There are accusations that this company does illegeal and unethical work. Here is an article written by J. Orlin Grabbe, How Secure is America's Nuclear Arsenal? This Article should cause you great concern as it shows how the US Nuclear Weapons and Plants have wide open access for private interests not just than Govenment or military to have access to them.
In the second video you can clearly see debris being blown back away from the wall. The F4 was completely shattered but parts were blown off and the wings stayed intact. The other factor is the F4 was just about out of fuel as it hit the wall. A missile or a plane would have additional energy in the fuel and/or payload it carried with it.
Considering that the damage to the building pushes the steel columns to the side and not in is very odd. You think that if a wing could take out a light pole a simple steel column would be Swiss cheese as well? Again it would seem odd that the building would collapse the way it did based on fire alone. Steel melts at 2800 degrees and the fuel from an aircraft burns at around 875 degrees. The other thing that is very odd is that you can see lots and lots of building debris, but I have yet to find one picture that shows any aircraft debris inside the building at all!
Something slammed into the Pentagon, but it wasn't a 757. Rumsfeld stated it was a Missile that hit the building during a slip of the ol'tounge. Take a look a this analysis on the missile theory...
Here is a video of the Pentagon Collapsing
Take note of the time posted in the white area. Why does it say Sep. 12, 2001, 17:37:19
Here you can still see the white smoke vapour trail:
Click for larger view
Perhaps this image of a small military aircraft would fit these doctored pictures.
Here is a link that goes into this avenue of thought much deeper, one of which based on the level of damage done to the Pentagon, is the most realistic.
In terms of an A3 and Missle hitting the Pentagon there seems to be a large body of evidence now supporting this. Jon Carlson has done some externsive work on this aspect. I am providing links here to his Analysis.
EXCLUSIVE 9/11 Pentagon A3 Skywarrior Wreckage Photos
A CLOSE LOOK: The 9/11 Pentagon TARGET WALL
CNN, Pentagon Videos Expose 9/11 White Jet & Helicopter
FBI Hides 911 Pentagon Hoax A3 Skywarrior Fuselage, Engine, & 9/11 Truth
Now for some mathematical Analysis of the Flight Speed:
Taken from here: Math Analysis of the flight speed of the object that hit the Pentagon
I've completed a more accurate and detailed analysis of the photographs. My initial estimate was that the tail of the plane was 465' from the impact point. Upon further examination it appears it could have been closer to 450' from the impact point, based on the following photo analysis.
The Pentagon measures 921.6 feet along each external face, half of this distance, marked on the diagram between the central corridor and the upper-left corner of the Pentagon (cyan) is 460.8' Take this base measurement as a scale and measure the distance from the rear of the plane in the photo (red dot), along the approximate path of the jet (dark-green line) to the impact point. The distance the tail traveled between frames (heavy red line) is approx. 450', which is just short of the originally estimated 465' or 3 lengths of a 757, which is 155'.
So, 450 feet traveled in 1/30th of a second = 13500 feet/sec. = 2.55 miles/sec. = 153.4 miles/min. = 9204.54 mph = 7997 kts. = Mach 12.11
Even if you alter the path of the jet to a direct (90 degree) impact trajectory, (which introduces other unexplainable issues such as intact light-posts and trees, clearing the embankment, not to mention those anomalous hydro spools) you still end up with a final velocity exceeding Mach 6!
The Sound Whoosh:
At least this statement is consistent with what we might expect if the plane hit the light poles. As I was saying earlier if the plane did hit the light poles it would do serious damage to the wing sections affected and would be a fire for sure. Some 757 have tanks in their wings and some don't. I suspect that this plane didn't have tanks or it would have been a fireball for sure. But the double whoosh sound is interesting in that it corresponds to some kind of an explosion perhaps before the plane hit the Pentagon. The witness statement above states that he didn't see the plane hit the light poles, just that there was debris flying. I'll keep digging. Anyway have a listen to this.
My point here is that a whoosh sound is made by explosions not by a plane engine. I guess it depends on the Whoosh type sound, perhaps it might also be a missile launching as well. Dick Eastman seems to think that the plane flew over the Pentagon and landed at a nearby base. Perhaps, it fired off two missiles at the Pentagon and flew over, but if it was being covered by a holographic projection from the C130 that was near by, then who really knows. It is all speculation right now. The other aspect to all this is that the Pentagon Defence System may have shot missiles at the incoming plane, which very likely was a Global Hawk painted to look like an AA 757. The other aspect was that the plane would have been flying mere few feet above the ground and few people saw it before it hit. Global Hawks make little noise and from what I understand it would have been descending from an altitude of about 60,000 feet.
A side note. The wire spools are telecomunication wire that contractors were using to install new cable into Pentagon. Mostly undamaged when comapared against the wall of the Pentaon. Originally I thought they were steel wire cable used to reinforce the building construction but thanks to a reader I was corrected on ths. Rob... Keep the info coming we are getting closer to the truth every day.
The only thing we really know is that there is no way a 757 can clip of 5 lamp poles with crashing and exploding into flames and there is no way that it could fit into the hole it made without some massive amounts of wreckage. There are lots of parts on the aircraft that don't burn at 875 degrees, where are they? Just add this to the puzzle for now.
Here is one Witness Statement:
Bush to Arrive at the Pentagon 2 Hours After the Crash:
"As I said, we were expecting President Bush about Noon, which would be a Code One Stand-By. In such situations, one of the problems I see at the heliport is that there are too many people there. Plus, there are many vehicles, including Secret Service, Pentagon SWAT, U.S. Park Police, D.C. Cops on motorcycles, and the two Presidential Limousines. And, some of these vehicles even park in front of the fire station apparatus door, blocking the fire truck from exiting the building! That is why I wanted the crash truck out of the station and parked in a good location, for easy access to the heliport in case of an emergency."
This unconfirmed statement from Alan Wallace now states that the President was to arrive at 12:00 PM and the first flight in to the heliport wasn't until 10:00 AM and the Crash Truck a brand new Titan 3000, Number 161 or 61 was parked by the Helipad.
Also you might like to review what technology was available 20 years ago for flying planes remotely:Popular Mechanics Missed NASA 911-Type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago
Theory on What Happened to the bodies of the Passengers and Crew:
Pentagon Building Defence Analysis: The Pentagon is one of the most heavily guarded and watched site on the Planet, with some exceptions to perhaps Area 51 and NORAD. With Radar systems capable of tracking objects right down to sea level, Friend or Foe System and Satellite systems it amazes me that flight that a rogue Boeing 757 could hit the Pentagon with out warning after 2 planes already had hit the World Trade Center. The Pentagon is equipped with the latest State of the Art technology in the War Room. Stand down orders had to be issued in order to keep the military from intercepting these planes and you all know who can give that order...
Some background facts:
The bottom line is we may never know what exactly hit the Pentagon, however that isn't the point. The point is there is enough evidence here proving that at 757 could not and did not hit the Pentagon. There is also a mountain of evidence pointing to the white wash and cover-ups concerning the WTC crash as well. The these poor souls who gave their lives in a Jihad against America were trained in and protected by the U.S. Military and Bush, they were mind controlled patsies used by the Military Industrial complex to put on a show for them. The fact that no Arabs were listed on the Manifest and exactly 20% occupancy on all 4 crashed flights is also an interesting aspect. If you look at the pictures of the dogs doing searches at the Pentagon for body parts, they all have blanked faces, like there is nothing there to find. The fact that there is no wing damage at all on the Pentagon wall should be enough for most people to realize that something is very wrong.
Important links related to the war on terrorism, but not to the Pentagon crash directly:
Interesting speeches by both George Walker Bush and Albert Gore on National Security
Interesting links which shed light on Rumsfeld and the Implementation of his military strategy (QDR) in September 2001
Links to Opinions and Developed Websites:
The Missile Theory Info: